The starting point was the vote of the rapporteur, Sérgio Furtado Coelho, still on Monday, before the request for a view made by the auditor Marco Aurélio Choy. There, the understanding was inaugurated that it would not be possible to frame Bruno Henrique in the two articles of the Brazilian Code of Sporting Justice (CBJD) in which he was initially framed: 243: To act, deliberately, in a manner prejudicial to the team he defends. 243-A: To act, contrary to sporting ethics, in order to influence the outcome of a match. Furtado Coelho understood that Bruno Henrique’s intention was not proven in any of the two cases. Choy was one of those who took longer voting in the continuation of the trial. He made mention of a comparative table between the convicted in manipulation cases discovered by the Maximum Penalty operation in 2023. There, he drew a parallel with the facts and evidence of the Bruno Henrique case.

How did STJD come to the R$ 100,000 fine for Bruno Henrique?

-

Flamengo and PSG have faced each other three times; check out their record
-

Indonesia Open Footgolf Tournament: Comedian Oki Rengga Admits Addiction, Wants to Become a Professional Athlete
-

Shameful Incident in Punjab! Landlord Rolls Tenant’s Daughter
-

Virgil van Dijk Expresses Desire for Mohamed Salah to Stay at Liverpool
Deixe um comentário